Digital divide discord

The BBC talks of the discord at the WSIS precomp last week in Geneva.

I must admit I, along with a co-conspirator who shall remain nameless, took advantage of the webcast and repurposed it as some sort of a videoconferencing system… Therefore, some of the finer points of the debates were lost to me (well, that might also have been because the webcast channel was the floor channel, without the translations).

Update: reflecting on the same issues, the Monde Diplomatique has an article titled «Les laissés-pour-compte du cyberespace» on the fracture numérique, where they refer twice to the IUT… Not the best article I’ve read from that publication I must say.

Philips on Windows media and the broadcast flag

MSNBC’s Philips talks to Web music stores, eyes media role . A couple snipets:

Philips, which globally ranks third behind Japan’s Sony and Matsushita, has chosen not to support Microsoft’s Windows Media Player in its consumer electronics products, a company spokesman said separately.

[Philips spokeperson] also criticised proposed U.S. legislation to set a  »broadcast flag » that would give a handful of technology companies and Hollywood studios control over re-distribution of digital television broadcasts, including movies.

  »We need a technology that works, that is available to everyone, managed in a fair way and not constrained to any particular group, » said Philips.  »There needs to be an open standard […] ».

[via MacMinute]

Les échecs d’une révolution

«Télécommunications, les échecs d’une révolution» dans le Monde diplomatique.

Eclatement de la bulle Internet, affaire Enron, endettement record de France Télécom : les entreprises de télécommunication se traînent désormais aux urgences de l’économie mondiale. La privatisation ayant succédé aux investissements publics, la surcapacité et une concurrence ruineuse, vieux fléaux économiques, hantent désormais la frontière du capitalisme de ce début de siècle. Salariés, particuliers et contribuables ont commencé à en payer le prix.

Un trop rare article en français sur la déréglementation des télécoms.

Canadians are among the world’s leaders in broadband use

ITU’s SPU newslog: Canadians are among the world’s leaders in broadband use.

Nearly half (49%) of all regular home Internet use households had a high-speed Internet connection in 2001. For the private sector, 2002 marked the first year in which the majority (58%) of enterprises using the Internet connected using broadband technologies.

Absolute percentage of broadband connected households being 23% and the percentage of broadband subscribers per inhabitant is 10.3%, close enough to the ITU Birth of Broadband figure of 11.2%.

Maybe StatCan excluded poor souls like me who connect through a cable modem at below single-ISDN speed and who’s DHCP lease mysteriously expire every few hours forcing a manual renewal? Yes yes, I’m bitter, especially because it is hard to complain about inadequate connections when you bust your monthly transfer quotas…

I didn’t find the Connectedness series when I was looking for it the other day. Good thing the article provides a handy link to the PDF.

Lemons and lemonade

« If you have lemons, make lemondade »

« Disruptive Technologies are lemonade »

Nice notes and quotes from IDRC people at a Berkman center presentation.

Ever noticed that according to geourl, the closest website to mine was Alternatives? I had not noticed either until recently. I have a friend who’s in Morocco on one of their projects.

Digital Media Conference

Frank has coverage of the Digital Media Conference at the Berkman Center with plenty of links to follow which could create an endless vortex of reading that threatens to extend way past lunch time.

Plenty of delicate issues revolving around DRM and governement intervention. And I have a paper to write on future avenues of music distribution. I need a catchy title. Anyone has a good translation for « Let the music play« ?

[update: Nice post by Matt who was there]

Monsanto

Monsanto, famous for the biotech backlashes it helped spur, from Agent Orange to BT corn, is at it again.

According to this Wired story:

[…] Monsanto officials say labels like « No rBST » or « rBST-free » are misleading, unfair and deceptive. The company has recently sued one dairy for its labels. « 

Should commercial speech include freedom of creating labels for any purpose? I’d be curious to hear any counter argument.

Commercial freedom of speech is a topic I don’t know anything about, but the most border line case I heard about is Kasky v. Nike that was recently settled. Outside from clearly deceptive speech (or libel, or hate speech, outside the US), can’t one freely represent the characteristics of his products? Maybe we should ask the makers of « new and improved flavour » dog food? Or what about Kosher labels?

More details on the lawsuit , Oakhurst Dairy , Monsanto’s press release, and the FDA’s opinion on labels: the main issue for them seems to be that « no hormones » would be misleading since a) there are cow hormones in any milk b) rbST is a synthesized version of bovine somatotropin and there is no difference in the hormones detectable in the milk, except, presumably, proportions.

It seems that rbST-free, instead of hormone-free would be Ok according to the FDA. Anyone with a link to the actual documents for this case?

Canada immune from enforcement?

Here we go again. After the Globe and Mail, Tech Central station is letting the scoop out to the Slashdot crowd.

Regarding the issue of exporting the litigation spree to Canada, beyond the issue of private copying creating more non infringing practices, another point to keep in mind is the absence in Canadian copyright law of disproportionately high statutory penalties, coupled with a widespread aversion in the judiciary for the American school of civil damage awarding.

Meanwhile, I must say did my part protesting the current state of affairs by shamelessly using and abusing my rights to private copying this week-end. Which made me realize that using dual firewire buses is preferable to daisy chaining CD-writers, 52x is not enough, neither are dual processors, and that currently available backup technologies (short of DLTs and a mortgage) are totally ill equipped to deal with current hard drive sizes.

Update: Joho the Blog also discovered this. I’m amazed that this was not widely known, considering the outrages, notably on Slashdot, when the levy was adopted and subsequently raised.